Free ATI TEAS 7 Reading guide
October 2026 - Drawing Conclusions Study Guide for nursing students in
A conclusion combines several details from across a passage into one judgement. Where an inference fills a gap in one place, a conclusion pulls threads together — which means an answer supported by only one sentence is usually the wrong one.
Conclusion or inference?
The two overlap and the exam does not always distinguish them carefully, but the difference is real and useful. An inference is local: one or two details imply something they do not say. A conclusion is cumulative: several details, often spread over the whole passage, add up to a judgement none of them states alone.
That changes how you check an answer. On an inference question you look for the words that support the choice. On a conclusion question you look for two or three separate places that all point the same way, and you are suspicious of a choice that leans on a single sentence.
How to build one under time
- Note the passage's two or three main moves as you read — a claim, a complication, a result.
- Ask what all of them are consistent with. That is your conclusion, before you look at the choices.
- For each choice, count the places in the passage that support it. One place usually means it is a detail dressed up as a conclusion.
- Reject anything that requires a fact the passage does not supply, however obvious that fact seems.
A recommendation is not a conclusion. "Managers should change the policy" is a course of action; the passage has to actually advocate it. Describing a problem, however clearly, does not commit an author to any particular fix, and a distractor that quietly turns a finding into advice is one of the most common wrong answers in the section.
Combining evidence across a passage
Worked example
Passage: "The ward's falls rate dropped by a third after the night lighting was changed. Over the same period the ward also gained two additional overnight staff. A neighbouring ward changed its lighting alone and saw no measurable change."
- Thread one: the falls rate fell where both changes happened.
- Thread two: the falls rate did not fall where only the lighting changed.
- Combine: lighting on its own does not appear to explain the drop, so the extra staffing is doing at least part of the work.
- Check the size of the claim. The passage cannot show that staffing alone would work, only that lighting alone did not.
The supported conclusion is that the improvement cannot be credited to the lighting change alone. Claiming the staffing caused it outright goes beyond two wards and one time period.
The traps
- The single-sentence answer — true, supported, and drawn from one detail rather than from the passage.
- The unearned recommendation — a course of action the passage describes a problem for but never proposes.
- The causal leap — two things reported together, restated as one causing the other.
- The reversed thread — a choice that uses the passage's evidence to support the opposite of what it concludes.
Terms to know
- Conclusion
- A judgement assembled from several details across a text.
- Inference
- An unstated point supported by a detail or two in one place.
- Correlation
- Two things occurring together. It does not establish that one caused the other.
- Causation
- One thing bringing about another. It needs more evidence than co-occurrence.
- Warrant
- The reasoning that licenses a conclusion from the evidence given.
What the TEAS asks most
The same core ideas appear in different wording. If you can answer these without stopping to think, you have what this section requires.
Which conclusion is best supported by the passage?
The one supported in more than one place, at the smallest scale the evidence allows.
The passage as a whole suggests that …
"As a whole" is the signal to combine. A choice resting on one sentence is being offered as bait.
Which conclusion does the passage NOT support?
Usually the one asserting cause from co-occurrence, or the one recommending an action the author never proposes.
Key points
- A conclusion combines evidence from across a passage; an inference works from one place.
- Decide what the details add up to before reading the choices.
- Count the supporting places. One is a detail, not a conclusion.
- Things happening together do not establish cause.
- A described problem does not authorise a recommended solution.
Review quiz
4 questions on this topic, each with the reasoning worked through. Pick an answer to see how it went, or open the explanation straight away.
Read the passage, then answer the questions below
When a regional trust introduced a single phone number for GP referrals, the average wait for an outpatient appointment fell from eleven weeks to eight. The trust publicised the drop widely. Two details went unmentioned. First, the new number went live in the same month that two additional consultants joined the outpatient department. Second, the eight-week figure excludes patients whose referrals were returned to their GP for more information, a category that grew from four per cent of referrals to eleven.
-
Question 1 of 4
Which conclusion is best supported by the passage as a whole?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. The reported improvement is less clear-cut than the trust's publicity suggests.
Two separate threads — the new consultants and the growing pool of excluded patients — both undercut the headline, so together they support exactly this cautious reading. Attributing the drop to the phone number ignores both. "Falsified" alleges intent the passage never raises, and the last choice generalises about outpatient waits everywhere from a single trust.
-
Question 2 of 4
Why can the reader not conclude that the single phone number caused the improvement?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Because another change happened at the same time, so the two cannot be separated.
Two consultants arrived in the same month, which means the passage reports two candidate causes and no way to tell them apart. The passage never says the number was ineffective, offers no view on what size of change matters, and makes no claim about normal fluctuation.
-
Question 3 of 4
What does the growth in returned referrals, from four per cent to eleven, most support?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. That the eight-week figure is flattered by leaving a growing group of patients out of it.
The passage states that returned referrals are excluded from the eight-week figure, so a category nearly tripling in size makes the headline number look better than the underlying position. GP carelessness, being overwhelmed and quality of care are all explanations the passage gives no evidence for.
-
Question 4 of 4
Which conclusion does the passage NOT support?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: C. The trust should abandon the single referral number.
Abandoning the number is a recommendation, and the passage complicates the evidence without ever proposing a course of action — the unearned-recommendation trap. The other three are each stated or directly implied: the omissions, the simultaneous changes, and the fall in the recorded figure itself.
Put this TEAS topic into practice
Build a set on drawing conclusions and use the rationale on every question to reinforce what you just reviewed.
Keep reading
More TEAS Resources
Guides and tools across the TEAS course.
TEAS 7 Exam Prep
Format, sections, timing
TEAS 7 FAQ
Scoring, retakes, test day
Is the TEAS Hard?
An honest answer
How Long Is the TEAS 7?
209 minutes, section by section
What Is a Passing TEAS Score?
Your programme sets the bar
TEAS Reading
18 topics · 39 scored questions
TEAS Math
18 topics · 34 scored questions
TEAS Science
22 topics · 44 scored questions
TEAS English
21 topics · 33 scored questions
Free TEAS Practice Test
Sit a set before you buy
TEAS Plans & Pricing
Choose your access
Start TEAS Prep
Create your account
TEAS Study Guide
All four sections, free
8-Week Study Plan
Week-by-week schedule
TEAS Cheat Sheet
Formulas and high-yield facts
TEAS vs HESI A2
Which exam to take
